8/22/12

GOP obsession with lady parts?


If there's one thing that confounds Republicans these days, it's lady parts.

What is the difference between legitimate and  forcible rape?

Chapin: Is there a GOP obsession with lady parts? - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_21357234#ixzz24H7qVTr4

If there's one thing that confounds Republicans these days, it's lady parts.

They don't understand them, but they must control them.

Alienating Female Voters Party, Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin

"First of all, from what I understand from doctors, [pregnancy from rape is] really rare.

If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."

The third bill that Republicans introduced in the 112th Congress, House Resolution 3,

Masterminded by Republicans Paul Ryan and Todd Akin

HR 3 eliminated longstanding Medicaid funding for abortion for poor women in the case of rape and incest and also attempted to redefine rape by limiting federal assistance to instances of "forcible rape."

The very first bill that Republicans introduced in the 112th Congress, HR 1,
went after federal family planning funding and support for Planned Parenthood.
Colorado Reps. Cory Gardner, Mike Coffman, Scott Tipton and Doug Lamborn all voted for HR 1.

Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, along with Akin, Gardner, Lamborn and Coffman — co-sponsored the original version of HR 3.

They apparently had no objection to the "forcible rape" language.

Legitimate rape, forcible rape — by the new Republican congressional

So Women, if you vote for Paul Ryan and/or Todd Akin you must agree with them?

No comments:

Post a Comment