11/5/16

Two presidential contenders in Indian Country

Mr. Robert Satiacum,
 
have you ever sat down
to write three names
on your computer
and
looked each one up
as to visits to Indian country?

OR

Looked up all proof positive
as to guilt or innocence?

Two presidential contenders
one called 'crooked' with absolutely no proof, just insinuations.

One that is a proven criminal, even by his own mouth!

So.

Why are my brothers and sisters still being ignored
by the law of the land?
I give you
(Robert Satiacum, a member of the Puyallup Tribe),
as proof positive!

Mr. Satiacum is in the position to be able to pull our people
out of the quagmire of government rules and regulations.
So, what does he do?
He flaunts the law of the land!
Trump,
in a Federal Lawsuit,
Seeks to Block Indian Casinos

By WAYNE KING,

Published: May 4, 1993


The Clinton Family visits to Indian Country
 
Stop the crying and let us get to work.
 

Native Americans want President Clinton (Madam President),


Bernie Sanders
spent more time with them
then she did this year.

That's one visit

Where was Bernie Sanders
for the other 35 plus years?

Native Americans want President Clinton

(Madam President),

to see the Substance shown at the DNC, take birth and grow into reality.

07/30/2016


Washington state elector says he won't vote for Clinton

Published November 05, 2016

Americans vote for the president on Election Day, but they're really casting votes for each state's electors, who will decide the next president on Dec. 19.

A Democratic elector in Washington state said Friday that he would not cast his Electoral College vote for Hillary Clinton if, as is likely, she wins the state in Tuesday's election.

Robert Satiacum, a member of the Puyallup Tribe, supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary, which the Vermont senator won by approximately a 3-to-1 margin. He said he believes Clinton is a "criminal" who doesn't care enough about American Indians and "she's done nothing but flip back and forth."

He said he has wrestled with what to do, but feels that neither Clinton nor Republican Donald Trump can lead the country.


Satiacum is one of Washington's twelve Democratic Electors, who pledged to represent the popular vote in the state.

He faces a $1,000 fine for not doing so, but in an earlier interview told KING 5 that doesn't bother him.

at No comments:

11/4/16

Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada

Welcome Yellowknife
Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada
To our main website
Hope that you had a pleasant, informational visit?
at No comments:

VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT #1


 
VOTE NO ON AMENDMENT #1
at No comments:

11/3/16

China hardware could be used for Cyber Espionage

Let's see, why are our computers, Emails, Twitter and Facebook accounts
being hacked by China and Russia?
China hardware could be used for Cyber Espionage
Back in the early 1980's while I was still a newbie to computers and reading my newspaper

(The New London Day).
I was shocked to read about our
military outsourcing computer equipment
to China of all places.
Not nearly as shocked as the author,
some retired navy admiral.

As he said back then,
computers controlled the armed forces airplanes, ships and equipment
and
China is still a communist country.

Today 98% of everything made, bought and sold in this country is made in another country, including our computers and their software.


U.S. Military Cautions Hardware from China could be used for Cyber Espionage

Defense officials have said that Pentagon's staff of late warned that no agency should use equipments of the computer manufacturer Lenovo of China following alarms that Pentagon networks could be spied upon.

According to one latest internal report that J-2 intelligence directorate presented, cyber-security officers feel alarmed that handheld devices and computers of Lenovo are likely to add remotely-controlled tainted hardware to the supply chain of Defense Department, endangering it with cyber espionage.

Pentagon uses the term

'supply chain'

to mean its worldwide suppliers' network which disburses chief components in the manufacture of military systems and weapons.

Yalibnan.com

posted this,

at No comments:

Utilities Pour Millions Into Solar Amendment

Utilities Pour Millions Into Solar Amendment
Clouded By Deceptive Intent
and
Opposed By Environmentalists
FlaglerLive | November 1, 2016
Smoking mirrors.
(Kevin T. Houle)
Four major electric utilities have surpassed the $20 million mark in combined contributions to support a proposed constitutional amendment on solar energy.
Florida Power & Light and Duke Energy last week dropped nearly $3 million into the “Consumers for Smart Solar” initiative — Amendment 1 on the ballot — that has been opposed by most major environmental groups in the state.
The latest money came as ads from Consumers for Smart Solar proclaim that Amendment 1 is “solar done right.” But backers of the initiative also have been grappling with a controversy stemming from the release of a tape in which a policy director for a Tallahassee-based think tank claimed to outline the utility industry’s efforts to deceive voters.
The latest contributions, $2 million on Oct. 24 from FPL and $999,998 last Tuesday from Duke, brought to nearly $20.2 million the amount the state’s four largest private utilities have spent on the amendment.
FPL has directed $8.055 million to the amendment. Duke Energy is at $6.7 million. Tampa Electric Co. has provided $3.2 million, and Pensacola-based Gulf Power is at $2.2 million.
Overall the Tallahassee-based Consumers for Smart Solar has received $25.78 million, of which $21.1 million has been spent. The group also has received $341,100 in-kind contributions.
By comparison, the state’s most expensive constitutional amendment campaign, the 2004 trial lawyer-backed Floridians for Patient Protection effort that pushed ballot initiatives opposed by the Florida Medical Association, spent $28.65 million.
Sarah Bascom, a spokeswoman for Consumers for Smart Solar, pointed to high advertising costs during this year’s elections.
“Due to the presidential election, Florida has remained a battleground state throughout the 2016 election cycle, making media costs more than we originally anticipated,” Bascom said in a statement on Monday.
FPL President Eric Silagy has said the Juno Beach-based company is backing the solar-energy amendment to guarantee consumer protections that now could be usurped by local and state government rule changes.
“I know it’s a popular story line to say this is just the utilities that are trying to protect a monopoly, but we don’t have a monopoly on rooftop solar, ground-mounted solar or anything else,” Silagy said when asked about the amendment earlier this month during a Florida Chamber of Commerce event in Orlando.
The Consumers for Smart Solar amendment would enshrine in the Florida Constitution existing rules regarding the use of solar energy by private property owners. The proposal also includes a more-contentious provision, which states that people who haven’t installed solar on their property “are not required to subsidize the costs of backup power and electric grid access to those who do.”
Proponents say the second provision provides consumer protections for people who don’t install solar panels. Opponents, such as the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, say it could result in “discriminatory charges” against rooftop solar users and limit the desire of people to go solar.
Critics of the amendment upped their efforts this month after the Miami Herald reported on an audio tape in which James Madison Institute Vice President of Policy Sal Nuzzo described how to use a “little bit of political jiu-jitsu” by promoting solar to win support for desired changes in policy.
Nuzzo’s comments came while speaking Oct. 2 at the “Energy/Environment Leadership Summit” in Nashville, Tenn.
“It should now be clear to all that Amendment 1 is a manipulatively designed tool for the utility industry to continue to dominate the energy market in Florida,” Tory Perfetti, chairman of Floridians for Solar Choice, an opposition group, said in a release Monday. “There is no other reason to dedicate roughly $25 million in an attempt to pass this anti-consumer, anti-solar, anti-free market amendment.”
The James Madison Institute asserted that Nuzzo misspoke. Consumers for Smart Solar said the James Madison Institute wasn’t involved in planning or drafting the proposal.
–Jim Turner,
News Service of Florida
at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)